PRK42 Farview Park Implementation


Project Details:

Project Start Date: January 1, 2023

Ongoing Program: N

Submitting Department: Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board

Contact Person: Adam Arvidson

Level of Need: High

Estimated Project Completion Date: December 31, 2024

Department Priority: 11

Contact Phone Number: 612-230-6470

Website: www.minneapolisparks.org


Project Location:

Address: 621 N 29th Ave.

City Sector: North

Affected Neighborhoods: Hawthorne

Affected Wards: 5


Project Description:

This project will implement a variety of recreational improvements at Farview Park in north Minneapolis. The requested funding in 2023 and 2024 is for a single phase two implementation of the adopted master plan for the park (a recently completed playground project was phase one). The exact improvements to be implemented are not currently known. MPRB has created a vision for the park through the North Service Area Master Plan, and will next involve the community in a scoping exercise to determine which of the master plan elements should be constructed in this planned phase one. The master plan for Farview Park does not call for significant change in the park, mainly because its primary features--a tall hill for which the park is named, and a large synthetic turf athletic field--are well loved. Many existing facilities will be enhanced, including basketball courts, play area, wading pool, outdoor gathering spaces, and multi-use field. New pathways will connect the whole park, even providing an accessible route to the top of the hill, so all can enjoy that exceptional view.


MPRB will begin this project with a participatory community process by which users and residents can help prioritize what is built in the park. The community process will consider which of those elements included in the adopted master plan should be built right away. The scoping process also will consider phasing logistics and feasibility, while ensuring that elements of the park are not decommissioned for long periods of time awaiting a future phase three. This scoping process is an important way to ensure continued community decision-making in park projects. It does mean, however, that this request is not specifically defined as to exactly what will be constructed. Requested funding would not move away from Farview, but it could be used for a variety of recreational improvements, based on community input.


Funding was previously requested for Farview at a lower amount. The increase requested here is due to MPRB's efforts to normalize funding amounts (See Purpose and Justification). That additional funding caused this project to be separated from the general PRKCP project into a new project because the total multi-year request is now greater than $1,100,000. The scale of this project suggests it should be considered individually by CLIC.



Purpose and Justification:

Farview Park phase two implementation is a project funded by the 20-year Neighborhood Parks and Streets Program. Under this program, MPRB has developed an empirical equity metric for ranking neighborhood parks based on community and park characteristics. A park’s score and resultant ranking determines when a park receives an allocation in MPRB’s CIP, while service area master plans determine what amenities are desired by the community and then implemented.


Farview Park’s 2019 NPP20 ranking is #17. This high ranking coupled with the fact that a master plan is complete justifies advancement of phase one implementation at the park.


Based on conversations during the 2019 presentation of MPRB's CLIC requests, staff performed an analysis of funding levels for various parks. CLIC members expressed ongoing support for MPRB's equity metrics, but raised questions about how much money each park was getting when it was entered into the CIP. MPRB staff looked at funding levels for each park receiving equity-driven NPP20 funds and developed a system for determining the relative scale of investments, based on size of park, number of amenities, presence of a recreation center, and degree of change proposed in the adopted master plan for the park. This analysis resulted in the discovery of eleven parks, including Farview, that have been under-funded in the early years of NPP20, relative to other similar parks. MPRB's adopted 2025 CIP year is considered a "normalization year," wherein additional funds are provided to certain parks. However, some parks were funded earlier that 2025, so that funding could be aligned in order to limit disruption and create efficiencies. It is for this reason that Farview's 2023 request is being increased and extended to 2024. More detailed information will be provided to CLIC along with MPRB's presentation of its request in 2020.


Project Visuals and Map:

Farview Park Master Plan

Project Cost Breakdown

Department Funding Request

Partnerships


Have Grants for this Project been secured?

No grants will be included in this project


Describe status and timing details of secured or applied for grants or other non-City funding sources:

Not applicable


Describe any collaborative arrangements with outside project partners, including who they are and what their role is with the project:

Not applicable


Planning


State Law Chapter 462.356 (Subd. 2) requires review of all capital improvements for compliance with the comprehensive municipal plan. Chapter 13, Section 4 of the City Charter requires Location and Design Review for the purpose of approving the sale of bonds for these projects. Describe how the project is consistent with the adopted City/Park Board comprehensive plans and how the project implements goals and policies as stated in the adopted plans, including specific policy references:


Projects funded with these dollars are consistent with the following direction of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board comprehensive plan:


Vision Statement: Dynamic parks that shape city character and meet diverse community needs.


Goal: Park facility renewal and development respects history and focuses on sustainability, accessibility, flexibility and beauty.


Strategy: Integrate sustainable practices, ecological design for landscapes, and green building techniques into new construction and renewal of all amenities, giving priority to those practices that meet or exceed established standards, improve ecological function, and minimize long-term maintenance and operating costs.


Strategy: Implement a sustainable, long-term renewal plan based on a complete inventory of the system, life-cycle cost analysis, and condition assessment of all park facilities.


Strategy: Build or renew facilities to meet or exceed standards for accessibility.


Relevant City of Minneapolis Comprehensive Plan Polices, from the Minneapolis 2040 Plan:

Policy 78 Park Design and Programming: Improve the design and programming of parks to better serve a changing population.

Policy 53 Quality of Life: Perpetuate a high quality of life for Minneapolitans that includes safe, open, and welcoming cultural and social institutions, as well as natural and built infrastructure. Especially applicable is Action Step 53c: Maintain and enhance the many built, historic, arts, and natural environmental assets throughout the city to promote and strengthen communities.

Policy 83 People with Disabilities: Ensure people with disabilities and their families are visible, active, and values members of the community. Especially applicable is Action Step 83h: Increase accessibility of public infrastructure and public amenities.



Provide the date that Location and Design Review was conducted for the project, the outcome of that analysis and the date formal action was taken by the Planning Commission:

Location and Design Review for this project will take place in the spring or summer of the funding year.


Economic Development


Will the project contribute to growth in the city’s tax base? No


Describe the economic development impact of the project:

Not applicable


Does the project support redevelopment opportunity that without the project would be infeasible?

No

Transportation


Is the proposed project on an existing or planned transitway, transit route, or high-volume pedestrian corridor? If yes, provide details on how the project will improve the transit and/or pedestrian experience.

No.


Does the proposed project anticipate multi-modal enhancements (sidewalks, bicycle or transit facilities)? Provide details.

Sidewalks and park trails may be included in the project


Is the right-of-way constrained and do you anticipate that modes of travel will be competing for space? Provide details, is there potential for innovative design options? Provide details

All improvements will take place within parkland, not right-of-way

Operating Impacts


Operations & Capital Asset Maintenance: Dependent on exact facilities implemented

Is this request for new or existing infrastructure? Likely a mix of new and existing facilities

What is the expected useful life of the project/Improvement? 20-40 years, depending on facilities

Year that Operating Incr/(Decr) will take effect? 2025

What is the estimated annual operating cost increase or (decrease) for this project? Dependent on facilities implemented

Any Prior Year Remaining Bond Authorizations? No

Prior Year Remaining Bond Authorizations: Not applicable


Describe how operating cost increases or decreases were determined and include details such as personnel costs, materials, contracts, energy savings, etc:

Increases in operating costs are possible depending on which amenities are implemented. Replacement and upgrades of existing facilities may have minimal operating cost increases, while larger elements like a new recreation center or sports dome will have significant increases. The North Service Area Master Plan includes calculations on likely operations increases for each element included in the master plan. Once project scoping is complete, MPRB staff will consider likely cost increases and incorporate them into existing operations budgets or will address increases through MPRB’s annual budgeting process.


If new infrastructure, discuss how the department/agency will pay for the increased annual operating costs:

Through reallocation of existing resources or additional funding.


For new infrastructure, describe the estimated timing and dollar amount of future capital investment required to realize the full expected useful life of the project:

None.

Project Coordination


Describe completion status for ongoing projects and how and when the department/agency plans to use the prior year remaining bond authorizations:

Not applicable.


If this is a new project, describe the major project phases and timing anticipated for completing the project:

Project scoping, including community engagement, will initiate in 2023, once funding becomes available. The community engagement and design process will likely continue throughout 2023. Construction would likely begin in 2024 and, depending on the complexity of the project, could continue into 2025.


Scalability/Funding Allocation Flexibility – discuss any flexibility to increase or decrease funding among the years in the five-year plan and the most that could be spent in a given year:

Moving funding from year to year will affect staff ability to implement projects. Delaying this project will invariably delay other park improvement projects called for in the CIP.



Minneapolis Goals and Strategic Direction

Minneapolis is a growing and vibrant world-class city with a flourishing economy and a pristine environment, where all people are safe, healthy and have equitable opportunities for success and happiness.Below is a description of how this project meets each of the City's Goals. Below is a description of how this project meets each of the City's Goals.


Below is a description of how this project meets each of the City's Goals.

Public Safety


Collaborative and community-inclusive strategies to ensure safety for all members of our community:

Construction projects in parks improve safety throughout Minneapolis’s parks, ensuring they are inviting and allow for healthful activities. They decommission outdated facilities and replace them with new ones that meet current safety and accessibility standards and expectations.

Housing


The City prioritizes equitable access to safe, stable, accessible, and affordable housing to eliminate racial disparities in housing:

Park improvements relate to housing in that they are sometimes identified as a gentrifying force in neighborhoods. The alternative, however, of not improving parks would do a disservice to those that use them. MPRB is committed to working with the City to identify and address potential park-related gentrification and displacement, in order to contribute to stable neighborhoods with excellent park service.

Economic Development


The City prioritizes economic inclusion so that all workers and families are supported and People of Color, Indigenous and Immigrant (POCII)-owned businesses in all sectors can thrive.

Quality of life is a critical aspect in a business's decision to relocate to, remain in, or expand in Minneapolis. City residents consistently rate parks as having extremely high importance to their quality of life. Therefore, park renewal to maintain quality and incorporate desired amenities can contribute significantly to business retention and recruitment, including among under-represented groups.

Public Services


The City prioritizes reliable and equitable access to high-quality public services.

Though semi-autonomous, MPRB strives for the same efficiency, transparency, and responsibility as stated in the City's goal. MPRB follows the City's purchasing procedures to ensure fair selection of services and detailed in-house project-by-project accounting ensures each project has a carefully managed budget. MPRB involves the public extensively in the scoping and design of park projects and provides detailed and extensive notifications during construction. Because the Farview Park master plan was driven by community involvement, implementation of that plan will allow the public to recreate daily and in ways that meet each individual’s particular needs.

Environmental Justice:


The City prioritizes sustainable practices and renewable resources to equitably address climate change while restoring and protecting our soil, water and air.

All park projects are executed with an eye to facility longevity and sustainability. MPRB strives to improve environmental performance and reduce waste with every construction project. Facility renewal and implementation of new amenities are important in meeting current and future needs for park infrastructure, which is a critical aspect of the city. Most park master plans, including Farview’s, call for reduction of turf grass and naturalized areas for pollinator habitat and air quality enhancement. When major projects like this one are implemented, this is an opportunity to plant additional trees, convert lawn to more sustainable ground surface, and reconsider stormwater management on park sites. All of the options will be considered as aspects of the project.

Built Environment & Transportation:


The City prioritizes high quality neighborhoods, streets, infrastructure and equitable access to multimodal transportation in all parts of the City through thoughtful planning and design.

Ensuring high quality parks communicates investment in people’s lives, no matter where they come from. In many cases, neighborhoods are physically and socially centered on their parks. Improving the park will improve the neighborhood. Farview Park is located within an area of concentrated poverty where more than 50% of the population are people of color (an ACP50 or RCAP). Investing in parks in areas like this shows commitment to even the most economically challenged in our community.

Public Health:


The City Prioritizes positive youth development so that all children can grow healthy and safe:

Improving park facilities and adding desired amenities can increase health and quality of life for neighborhood residents of every age, ability level, economic status, race, ethnicity, and national origin. The Farview Park Master Plan includes numerous facilities intended for year round use by youth and teens, specifically the athletic field, which allows for high quality play of multiple sports, and the recreation center and gym, one of the larger such facilities on the north side.

Arts and Culture:


The City prioritizes arts and culture as important part of inclusive economic development and placemaking in our communities:

MPRB seeks to incorporate the arts into projects when it can, by partnering with the City of Minneapolis’s public art program. Even without the specific inclusion of art in park improvements, however, creative and inspiring design is a key part of the park improvement process. In addition, parks often sit at the cultural center of communities, whether people are visiting the park for an art class, participating in spontaneous cultural experiences, attending a cultural event, or simply interacting with peers from different backgrounds in the park.

Additional Information

None