General Fund revenue discussion
Revenue discussion for some of the largest categories in the General Fund.
PROPERTY TAXES
As the City’s largest revenue source, property taxes are essential to understanding the fiscal health of the City in current and future years. For Menlo Park and the surrounding area, property taxes have proven quite resilient even through the depths of the Great Recession, a trend which may or may not be affected by the economic condition of the COVID-19 pandemic. This resiliency is attributed to location, land use decisions, significant investment in real estate improvements, and turnover in the housing stock to yield new base year assessed valuations in accordance with State law which caps the base property tax rate at 1 percent of base year assessed valuation adjusted annually for cost of living not to exceed 2 percent (Proposition 13).
Property tax is comprised of several components with secured property tax, the tax on real property and the structures on that real property, making up the single largest component. Secured property tax revenue is driven primarily by increases in assessed valuation. Unsecured property tax represents the tax on appurtenances such as furniture. Supplemental property tax is the result of reassessing the value of real property when there is a change of ownership or new construction is completed after the official lien date. Documentary transfer tax is a tax imposed on documents exchanged in the transfer of interest in real estate and is based on the value of the real estate. The tax collector administrative fee is budgeted as a contra-revenue, displayed as a negative number, which offsets the net receipts to the City for property taxes.
Due to the uncertainty surrounding the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, property taxes as a whole and by each category are assumed to be flat with the prior year budget except where reasonable estimations can be made. The primary change, in secured property tax, is a result of a potential change to the distribution formula used for excess Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (excess ERAF), currently pending determination by the State Department of Finance. Such a change, with associated penalties for previous allocations, may reduce the City's receipt of excess ERAF by $0.26 million, reflected in the year-over-year change in secured property taxes. Following the City's traditional of considering excess ERAF to be an endangered revenue source, only 50 percent is budgeted and reasonably expected to be received regardless of any changes in distribution formulas or legislative changes resulting from the State's own budgetary needs.
Property taxes, shown below in Exhibit 1.09, total $27.34 million for fiscal year 2020-21.
Exhibit 1.09a Property Taxes
FUTURE OF PROPERTY TAXES
Overall, the outlook for property tax is conservative. While property tax receipts are not expected to be impaired to the level that other revenues may be in the face of the economic crisis, the consistently high growth rates experienced over the prior several years are unlikely to continue or resume for some time. Several areas of particular concern may however result in a substantial impairment to future property tax receipts.
Excess ERAF
When the State of California imposed the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) on cities and special districts across the State in the early 1990s to alleviate the State’s funding obligations to local schools, property taxes were diverted from cities to schools. As assessed values in San Mateo County grow, the funds deposited to the County’s ERAF exceeds the mandated distribution to schools and are returned to the taxing entities. Excess ERAF revenue had been considered at high risk out of concern that the State might update the school funding formulas to fully utilize the ERAF collections. Additionally, the State Department of Finance conducted a review of the allocation methods used by taxing entities to return excess ERAF and may determine that San Mateo County's method excluded some entities to which ERAF was due, resulting in retroactive changes and penalties. Finally, as the State looks to balance its own budget, legislative changes may remove excess ERAF and re-purpose it elsewhere. To protect against a budget deficit that might result from a loss of excess ERAF revenue, the City continues the practice of budgeting only 50 percent of the prior year’s excess ERAF revenue. The City continues to closely monitor this revenue source and update budget expectations accordingly.
Assessed valuation appeals
When owners of a large and complex property appeals their base-year assessed value, the appeal can often take many years to resolve. If the appeal results in a lower Proposition 13 assessed value, the property owner receives a credit for property taxes in excess of the lowered assessment and the loss is apportioned to all cities in the County. In recent years, there have been notable appeals on unsecured property related to aircraft at San Francisco International Airport which have resulted in reductions to Menlo Park’s property tax revenue. The County Assessor’s staff advised the City in May 2017 that the volume of appeals, the time required to resolve appeals, and insufficient staffing in the Assessor’s office to manage the appeals has resulted in a significant backlog in appeal resolutions. One prominent appeal originally filed for the period of 2000 to 2004 was only recently resolved.
In addition, the effect of the economic crisis on assessed valuations is unclear at this time and unlikely to be fully known for several years. As a result, property tax collections in future years may be reduced by the timing effect of valuations conducted after tax rolls are finalized.
Exhibit 1.09b
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
Transient occupancy tax (TOT or hotel tax) is the tax added to hotel guest bills for stays of fewer than 30 days. For fiscal year 2020–21, transient occupancy tax revenue is budgeted at $4.72 million, down 54 percent from the fiscal year 2019–20 budget. This category of taxes is the most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and the near complete suspension of business and leisure travel starting in March 2020. Given the uncertainty surrounding development of a vaccine and the continued reduction in travel, this category is unlikely to fully recover within fiscal year 2020–21.
While the number of hotel rooms and the average nightly rate had reached historic highs by the middle of fiscal year 2019–20, such levels are unlikely to resume immediately. Fortunately, the Great Recession provides some guidance on the economic impact of hotels and the impact on Menlo Park hotels during the Great Recession showed a slowing of transient occupancy tax revenue followed by a steep increase. The differences between the Great Recession and the current public health driven conditions are incompletely known at this time, and staff will continue to closely monitor this revenue source as more information becomes available.
Exhibit 1.10 Transient Occupancy Tax
SALES TAX
Sales tax revenue has been a revenue in decline for the past decade in terms of share of overall revenue even before the shock of the economic crisis which resulted in temporary or permanent closure of many sales tax sources such as restaurants and retail stores. The historical loss of major sales tax generating sources has caused sales tax revenue to move from the second largest tax revenue source to third, falling behind transient occupancy taxes. The previously discussed changes to the transient occupancy taxes may result in sales taxes again becoming the second-largest tax source for the City, though accurate impacts are difficult to quantify at the time of budget preparation due to the delay in remittances to the City. Sales taxes are budgeted at $5.02 million for fiscal year 2020-21.
Unchanged from previous years, the forecasting process for sales tax is complicated and difficult, due in part to the increasing amount of sales tax received from the County pool. Pooled revenues are expected to continue to be a significant portion of the City’s overall sales tax revenue as e-commerce continues to become a larger part of the economy.
When transactions occur online for sales tax-eligible purchases, the 1 percent share received by cities goes into a County pool for distribution rather than the City where the goods are delivered. For example, if someone shops at the Staples in Menlo Park and purchases a computer, the City receives 1 percent of the sale price in sales tax revenue. If that same person buys that computer via the Staples website, the 1 percent of the sale price, instead, goes to the County pool for distribution to all agencies, as the revenue from online purchases is tracked to the County where the customer is located, rather than to a more precise location due to the lack of detail in the seller’s tax return. The County pool is distributed to each jurisdiction based on its share of total taxable sales. This is an important consideration because a jurisdiction’s share of pooled revenue is directly tied to its proportion of the local 1 percent amount it receives in relation to the other jurisdictions in the County. This effect is likely to be slightly but not fully offset by the increased number of online retailers collecting sales tax following a Supreme Court ruling which went into effect during fiscal year 2019–20 but whose full implications are not yet known.
The impact of the economic crisis and of e-commerce on Menlo Park’s sales tax revenue will continue to be monitored closely, with the 10-year forecast updated accordingly should conditions change.
Sales Tax Exhibit 1.11
UTILITY USERS’ TAX
The Utility Users’ Tax (UUT) became effective April 1, 2007, imposing the voter-approved maximum 3.5 percent tax on gas, electrical and water usage and the maximum 2.5 percent tax on cable, telephone and wireless services. On July 19, 2007, the City Council approved a temporary reduction in the tax rate on all utilities to 1 percent, which became effective October 1, 2007, and has been reauthorized each year for the maximum period of a temporary reduction of 12 months. Additionally, there is a cap of $12,000 on the combined annual amount that a user can pay for electric, gas and water. As the historical graph demonstrates, Exhibit 1.12, UUT is not a growing source of revenue, as changes in certain industries, notably the telecom and cable industries, are causing erosion in those revenue sources offsetting any growth from other sources.
UUT is projected to be approximately $1.22 million in fiscal year 2020–21, which is modestly lower than final fiscal year 2019–20 estimates as utility use is expected to be reasonably lower from business sources due to reduced activity, but is considered to be largely inelastic for many utility users.
Exhibit 1.12 Utility Users' Tax
CHARGES FOR SERVICE
This category includes revenue collections from fees charged for services provided by City operations. Due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, many of the services traditionally provided by the City have undergone rapid and fundamental change. Social distancing, sanitation requirements, and budgetary constraints have all contributed to the changes which are particularly concentrated in this revenue category.
Historically, the Library and Community Services Department and Community Development Department were the main drivers of charges for service. While development-related charges are expected to continue at a somewhat reduced level, major changes to programming in Library and Community Services substantially reduce the expected revenue in fiscal year 2020-21 as compared to prior years. These fees are guided by the City's cost recovery policy, which specifies a subsidy level for various categories of activities. The cost to provide services may require review in light of the additional COVID-19-related restrictions which may adjust fees charged but which will require time to prepare and validate.
Exhibit 1.13 Charges for Services
Other Revenue
Franchise Fees
The City receives franchise payments from companies providing garbage, electric, gas, water and cable television services. Total franchise fee revenue budget is $2.09 million in fiscal year 2020–21, growing approximately 1 percent compared to the prior year.
Licenses and permits
This category mainly consists of development-related permitting, including revenue from development agreements, and the business license tax. The 2020–21 budget is $2.26 million, which is a 20.5 percent decrease from prior year and heavily dependent on continued development activity as pandemic conditions evolve.
Intergovernmental revenues
This category consists of grants from other governmental entities, including the Federal and State government. Total intergovernmental revenue for fiscal year 2020–21 is budgeted at $0.64 million, which is a 48.8 percent decrease from prior year, largely driven by the expectation that child care ratios will result in lower grant money provided by the State.
Fines and forfeitures
This category of revenue consists of traffic-related fines, the fiscal year 2019–20 budget ($0.10 million) reflects expected revenues based on night time parking and as-needed traffic enforcement as the proposed budget does not include daytime parking or a traffic unit, differing from prior years. This category sees a reduction of approximately 88.2 percent compared to the previous budget amounts.
Interest and rent income
This revenue category consists of the proceeds the City receives from the properties it leases, as well as earnings from the City’s investment portfolio. With respect to rental income, the fiscal year 2020–21 budget ($0.64 million) and beyond reflect the contractual terms of the various leases, including an annual rent increase which tracks that of inflation. For interest earnings, the fiscal year 2020–21 projection of $0.44 million, net of investment advisory fees, reflects the steep decrease in yield seen over recent months and the expectation that it will continue to decrease for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Transfers, other revenue and resources
The remaining revenues consist primarily of funds transferred into the General Fund from other City funds to pay for the cost of citywide administration, including the cost of Finance, Human Resources and the City Manager’s Office. The fiscal year 2020–21 transfer amount of $0.57 million was set based on the percentage increase in staffing costs for the applicable departments.
One item about this category which is important to note in fiscal year 2020–21 is the assigned fund balance as a resource to fund General Fund requirements. This resource, representing use of the economic stabilization reserve, is included to offset the expectations of reduced revenue and increased expenditures in the child care operations following modifications to the student-teacher ratio to protect public health.
The prior year included this resource in order to fund the first year of the accelerated pension payment schedule but has not been directed as of budget preparation. Not included is a component included in prior amended budgets which accounts for liabilities outstanding at the end of the fiscal year. At the beginning of the fiscal year, a portion of the fund balance is reserved to allow payments of encumbrances that the City may still need to make related to the past fiscal year. This number is not reasonably estimable during the budget development process but has been incorporated into the mid-year review in prior years.